1. DivisionFußball(M)
22. Spieltag
Spartak Vladikavkaz
Spartak
1
0
FK Nizhniy Novgorod (old)
FK Nizhniy Novgorod (old)
0
0
18:00
Fr, 12.08.
Beendet
| # | Mannschaft | Mannschaft | Sp. | S | U | N | Tore | Diff. | Pkt. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | Spartak Vladikavkaz | Spartak | 22 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 32:9 | 23 | 48 |
| 2 |  | Shinnik Yaroslavl | Shinnik | 22 | 14 | 3 | 5 | 42:20 | 22 | 45 |
| 3 |  | Mordovia Saransk | Saransk | 22 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 38:22 | 16 | 43 |
| 4 | | FK Nizhniy Novgorod (old) | FK Nizhniy Novgorod (old) | 22 | 14 | 0 | 8 | 36:27 | 9 | 42 |
| 5 |  | Enisey Krasnoyarsk | Enisey | 22 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 29:22 | 7 | 38 |
| 6 |  | FK Ural | FK Ural | 22 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 31:19 | 12 | 36 |
| 7 |  | FK Kamaz | FK Kamaz | 22 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 27:18 | 9 | 36 |
| 8 |  | Sibir Novosibirsk | FK Sibir | 22 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 35:24 | 11 | 34 |
| 9 |  | Torpedo Moskva | Torpedo | 22 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 24:20 | 4 | 29 |
| 10 |  | SKA-Energiya Khabarovsk | SKA-Khabarovsk | 22 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 25:34 | -9 | 28 |
| 11 |  | Chernomorets Novorossisk | Chernomorets Novorossisk | 22 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 20:19 | 1 | 27 |
| 12 |  | Torpedo Vladimir | Torpedo Vladimir | 22 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 23:34 | -11 | 26 |
| 13 |  | FC Zhemchuzhina-Sochi | FK Zhemchuzhina | 22 | 8 | 2 | 12 | 22:33 | -11 | 26 |
| 14 |  | Dinamo Bryansk | Dinamo Bryansk | 22 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 20:30 | -10 | 24 |
| 15 |  | FC Volgar-Gazprom | FK Volgar | 22 | 7 | 3 | 12 | 15:28 | -13 | 24 |
| 16 |  | Gazovik Orenburg | FK Orenburg | 22 | 4 | 10 | 8 | 24:27 | -3 | 22 |
| 17 |  | FK Khimki | FK Khimki | 22 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 22:39 | -17 | 22 |
| 18 |  | Luch-Energiya Vladivostok | FC Luch | 22 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 16:20 | -4 | 20 |
| 19 |  | Baltika Kaliningrad | Baltika | 22 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 12:31 | -19 | 20 |
| 20 |  | Fakel Voronezh | Fakel Voronezh | 22 | 2 | 6 | 14 | 8:25 | -17 | 12 |
- Aufstieg
- Relegation
- Abstieg
- Am 06. August 2011 gab der FK Zhemchuzhina seinen sofortigen Rückzug aus der Liga bekannt. Grund sind zu hohe Schulden. Das folgende Ligaspiel gegen FK Ural wurde daraufhin vom Verband mit 0:3 gewertet.
